Over the past year, the Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The ...

The University of Connecticut was recently in the news, including in the Chronicle (“Another Public Flagship May Cut Dozens of Majors,” October 17), regarding our ongoing planned review of academic ...

Academic program reviews (not associated with accreditation reviews) are to occur every 8 years according to a published timetable included in this document. Important characteristics of the academic ...

Reviews are thorough and require 12-18 months to complete. Brief descriptions of the individual process elements with linked guides and templates are provided below. A complete overview of the process ...

The Program Performance Review Committee developed an Annual Program Review (APR) process that will be timelier and more meaningful, along with two complementary dashboards. The committee was composed ...

As programs continually review quantitative and qualitative information related to program outcomes and viability, it is sometimes necessary to phase out an academic program. The formal policies that ...

Unfortunately, this book can't be printed from the OpenBook. If you need to print pages from this book, we recommend downloading it as a PDF. Visit NAP.edu/10766 to get more information about this ...