A Notre Dame professor and other scholars submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, warning against restricting birthright citizenship.
The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in Trump v. Barbara. The Court will decide a case that reaches far beyond the usual debates over immigration policy. President Trump aims ...
The state’s highest court is referring an Omaha divorce attorney for discipline after filings in a divorce case were found to ...
Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. Please ...
Law professor Dan Epps joins the Supreme Court Brief podcast to discuss why he thinks the case over President Donald Trump's tariffs is a test of jurisprudential consistency for the conservative ...
It’s the age-old question: Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Of course, this raises the obvious follow-up: Which cases are the important ...
The 71-page filing, submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on March 31 and obtained by MBW, ...
“It is truly a testament to where we are as a society today that it must be said in the context of federal civil rights ...
Parties to the legal controversy over Quincy's statues of St. Michael and St. Florian are set to soon argue before the ...
Do amicus, or “friend of the court,” briefs matter in Supreme Court cases? As someone who sometimes writes and signs on to amicus briefs, I often wonder if they are worth the time and effort.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results